MY KOLKATA EDUGRAPH
ADVERTISEMENT
regular-article-logo Friday, 03 May 2024

Withdrawal of Rs 2000 notes not demonetisation but statutory exercise: RBI to Delhi HC

Bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad say it will pass an appropriate order on public interest litigation by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay

PTI New Delhi Published 24.05.23, 04:10 AM
Representational image.

Representational image. File photo

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Tuesday told Delhi High Court that withdrawal of Rs 2000 notes is not demonetisation but a statutory exercise, and the decision to enable their exchange was taken for operational convenience.

The court was hearing a plea by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay that the notifications by the RBI and SBI enabling exchange of Rs 2000 banknotes without proof were arbitrary and against the laws enacted to curb corruption.

ADVERTISEMENT

A bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad said it will an pass appropriate order on the public interest litigation by the lawyer.

“We will look into it. We will pass an appropriate order,” said the court.

Upadhyay clarified that he was not challenging the decision to withdraw Rs 2000 banknote but assailed the exchange of the currency without any slip or identity proof.

He asserted that the exchange of Rs 2000 banknote should be allowed through deposit in bank account.

“Why is ID proof excluded? Every poor has a Jan Dhan account. BPL persons are also connected to bank accounts,” Upadhyay said while claiming that the present arrangement would only enable mafias and gangsters like “Atiq Ahmed’s henchmen” as well as Naxals.

Senior advocate Parag P Tripathi, for the RBI, emphasised that the court cannot interfere in such matters and the decision was taken to allow exchange of the Rs 2000 currency note for operational convenience.

“This is not demonetisation. Rs 2000 banknote was not commonly used. Other denominations continue to meet currency requirements,” he said.

“This is a statutory exercise. None of the points claimed by the petitioner impinge or deal with constitutional issues,” Tripathi added.

“Arguments heard. Judgement reserved,” the court said after hearing the parties.

The petitioner has contended in his plea that notifications by the RBI and SBI enabling exchange of Rs 2000 banknotes without requisition slip and identity proof were arbitrary, irrational and offend Articles 14 of the Constitution of India.

The petition has said that a large amount of the currency has reached either in individual’s locker or has “been hoarded by the separatists, terrorists, Maoists, drug smugglers, mining mafias & corrupt people”.

The petition has highlighted that cash transaction in high value currency is the main source of corruption and is used for illegal activities like terrorism, naxalism, separatism, radicalism, gambling, smuggling, money laundering, kidnapping, extortion, bribing and dowry, etc. and the RBI and SBI should ensure that Rs 2000 banknotes are deposited in respective bank accounts only.

Follow us on:
ADVERTISEMENT